Controversy in interpreting astrological zodiac signs

  Astronomy from the beginning knows and has calculated that the duration and number of zodiacal signs described and that astrology is based are wrong. Astronomically it is known that the zodiacal signs are not the same length of time, since the zodiacalconstellations have different sizes, and therefore, the signs of the Zodiac should takedifferent numbers of days, and therefore should not be divided arbitrarily to cover equally a period of one year. Equally well known that in the strip of sky called the Zodiac, through which the Sun transits, there is also a thirteenth constellation, Ophiuchus call (Ophiuchus).If this is the fact that the Earth's axis moves each year, then after about three thousandyears since the original fixed zodiac horoscope would have to delay a complete sign.Admittedly, the existence of the thirteenth sign was already known since antiquity.

  Although the mere observation of the current sky shows the temporary presence as athirteenth constellation Ophiuchus, many astrologers claim that astrology does not change discovery and continue to use the Babylonian horoscope, consisting of twelve signs, as the Zodiac sign and constellation are different ideas.

 By Caroline Nuñez